Search for: "Fields v. Holder et al" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Florian Mueller
Google is also very high-profile, the make-it-or-break-it question of the appeal was copyrightability) is the "Google Books" case, The Authors Guild, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]