Search for: "Fine v. University of Utah" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations, Brad Biddle, Arizona State University, Jorge Contreras, University of Utah, and Vigdis Bronder, Biddle Law Would expect to find certification marks going along w/standards orgs. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Click Here Other Articles on the Same Topic: Dairy Operation Fined for Improper Waste Release. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Such nondiscrimination conditions attached to government-provided benefits are constitutional even as to purely ideological groups that seek, for instance, the sorts of benefits that universities routinely provide to all student groups, see Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 1:46 pm by vforberger
$1,000 criminal fine for each employee who is misclassified, subject to a maximum fine of $25,000 for each violation, but only if the employer has previously been assessed a civil penalty for misclassified workers [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
– The Bridgeport News, February 24, 20102010 The University of Bridgeport has paid a $12,900 fine and will complete a supplemental environmental project (SEP) worth at least $56,000 to settle claims by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it violated federal regulations covering the storage and handling of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Eric Goldman makes the interesting suggestion that she should apply her thesis to "para-trademark" laws like Utah's online registry law. 1A challenges might work well there even if courts resist them in traditional TM law. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
A small project at Johns Hopkins University seemed to bear this out. [read post]