Search for: "First v. Armes (1983)" Results 41 - 60 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 7:40 am by Anastasia Bradatan
The holding in these cases, “a particular claim that may be brought under 42 US Code Section 1983 need not be brought first in habeas,” did not foreclose al-Qahtani’s motion as not being sound in habeas. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Because the police believed that Pride was dangerous, a heavily-armed SWAT team conducted a dynamic entry into the residence early the next morning to execute the search warrant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Because the police believed that Pride was dangerous, a heavily-armed SWAT team conducted a dynamic entry into the residence early the next morning to execute the search warrant. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:45 am by Eugene Volokh
§1983, was not prominent until the mid-20th century. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Soren Dayton, Erica Newland
  These bills are the first holistic rethink of national security laws from the 1970s—namely the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the National Emergencies Act of 1976 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976—since INS v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm by Andrew Hamm
§ 1983 if they have unsuccessfully sought testing under state procedures. [read post]