Search for: "Flores v. Texas" Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Flores, 543 F.3d 248, 252 (5th Cir. 2008)).[7]If a district court can exercise original federal-question jurisdiction over an action, then a federal court may exercise removal jurisdiction over that action. [read post]
19 May 2018, 10:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"A Farmer's Branch police officer who'd never hypnotized anyone before failed to follow a number of mandatory requirements under Texas Court of Criminal Appeals jurisprudence in Zani v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs in the Texas case disagree with me here and assert that proof of invidious motive has been eliminated by the Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals approved the use of hypnosis in a case called Zani v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” While in the care of the federal government, ORR must serve the best interests of the minors, which includes complying with all the terms of a settlement agreement in a prior case, Flores v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:25 am by Ron Voyles & Associates
              Last week the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas gave us some insight into the current state of guns laws in Texas and the availability of a self-defense claim handing out a decision entitled State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
 Ex parte Flores, 483 S.W.3d at 639 (citing Turner Broad., Sys., 512 U.S. at 642, 114 S.Ct. 2445, and Ward v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]