Search for: "Ford v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in 1937 two states (Pennsylvania and Indiana) each had more than a thousand articles referencing court packing. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Alabama: The question before the Court is whether, consistent with the Eighth Amendment, and the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ford v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At The New Republic, Matt Ford explains that although “Chief Justice John Roberts closed the door” this term on federal courts as a remedy for partisan gerrymandering, his opinion in Rucho v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The estate then filed a complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance, seeking damages from the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund, which is governed under state law. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
The court has previously ruled that the state may not constitutionally execute the mentally insane (Ford v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Sherwood Medical Industries, 836 F.2d 296, 298-99 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying Indiana law). [read post]