Search for: "Free Range Content, Inc. v. Google Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2018, 3:03 am
The decision does not sit comfortably with subsequent findings by the Court of Appeal in Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 (where this firm acted for the claimant) that an intermediary/platform can be deemed a publisher after notice or the CJEU’s in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12) that Google is… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Website blocking is a legitimate tool used by many free and democratic countries that support an open Internet including England, France, Portugal, and Italy to block a variety of websites that disseminate illegal content such as child pornography, malware, investment fraud, terrorism, personal information, counterfeiting, and copyright infringement.[4] The jurisdiction to make such orders has been available throughout the EU since 2001 and has been used to… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
The blog was hosted on Blogger.com, Google Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am
LinkedIn’s privacy arguments rang hollow. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
See, e.g., Balboa Island Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
In 2011, for example, the Renton Police Department obtained a search warrant to compel Google to identify the individual who had anonymously posted cartoon videos on YouTube making fun of, and criticizing, the City of Renton and its Police Department. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
* Free Range Content, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Following the important decision by the European Court of Justice in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (2014), which found a “right to be forgotten” in the European Data Protection Directive, it is natural to ask if there is an equivalent or similar right to be forgotten in Canada. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm
Lakin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:57 am
Turkey regarding hosts and SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Google Inc., 653 F. 3d 976, 980 (9th Cir. 2011). the Court said that “a copyright holder possesses ‘the right to exclude others from using his property. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
The court also observes that Alcede had been posting content to the page that was disparaging or negative to the business. [read post]
