Search for: "Freitas v. Freitas"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Economou v De Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (Warby J) – the defendant successfully defended a libel claim on the basis of “serious harm” and “public interest”. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
The following cases are awaiting a decision of a Court of Appeal Judge on permission to appeal on the papers Burki v Seventy Thirty Bokova v Associated Newspapers Limited Harlow Higinbotham (formerly BWK) v Wipaporn Teekhungam & Ors Sarayiah v Williams ABC v Google LLC The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 5:08 am
O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) retomou nesta sexta-feira (31), às 9h, a segunda e última etapa da audiência pública que reúne especialistas de órgãos públicos, entidades da sociedade civil, representantes da indústria, de trabalhadores e de vítimas do amianto para debater o uso desse mineral no país. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:45 am
– Persephone Bridgman Baker Libel Injunctions: Time to revisit the rule in Bonnard v Perryman? [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:51 am
Freitas, 800 F.2s 1451 (U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm
Finally, in view of the UKSC’s finding of non-infringement of Article 6 ECHR in Coventry v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Conforme a denúncia, o crime ocorreu em 2009 no Município de Lauro de Freitas, na Bahia. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:51 pm
Decisão liminar obrigou o candidato a senador do DF, Jorge de Freitas Antunes (PSOL), a retirar de seu blog as críticas feitas ao seu concorrente, Rodrigo Sobral Rollemberg (PSB). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
There may be some other way in which the hypothetical ordinary reasonable reader would identify him/her: Economou v de Freitas [2017] EMLR 4, [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016) [9] … 21. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
” The Zelo Street blog has a piece on Louise Mensch and the referendum result: “Don’t Menshn Brexit, Stupid” Last week in the Courts The trial in Economou v De Freitas continued on 20 and 22 June 2016 before Warby J. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has commented on decision in the case of Economou v De Freitas which provides guidance on what constitutes a matter of public interest as a defence (pursuant to s.4 Defamation Act 2013) in defamation cases. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
A copy of the judgment can be found here [pdf] Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
In other words, he considered that “minimum interference” option which forms the third stage of Lord Clyde’s threefold analysis in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, Lands and Housing (1998) had no part to play in this case. [read post]
