Search for: "French v. Jones"
Results 41 - 60
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
France It is reported that French author Ariane Fornia has been found guilty of defamation, after Pierre Joxe, a former government minister challenged her claim of sexual assault. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Jones, the Eighth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the trial court’s judgment. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
Jones v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
France The French data protection authority, the CNIL, has released its report on facial recognition. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The Guardian had a piece on the Sandra Muller, a woman who launched a French version of the #MeToo campaign to expose abusive male behaviour, been found guilty of defaming a media executive she accused of making lewd and sexist remarks. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
Jones v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:09 am
Co v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
Sadler * No: Justices DeWine, French, and O’Donnell. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
This concerned the ruling in the case of 07188-18 Jones v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2018). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd, 2019 ABCA 49 [30] Addressing the “standard of proof” is not therefore a stand-alone test for whether summary judgment is possible or appropriate. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:17 am
” Justice French, majority opinion On October 31, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Schmitz v. [read post]
