Search for: "Friedman v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm
In that context, banning child labor often ends up hurting poor families rather than helping them, as I explained here: By modern standards, the United States in 1918 was a very poor society. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
10 May 2021, 5:36 pm
It is not a perfect solution, but there it is.Communications Workers of America Local 4123 v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:56 am
The case of the day is Porsche Motorsport North America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 11:13 am
Bryza is suggesting that a lame-duck President who, I hope, will have been soundly repudiated in November by the victory of Obama-Biden, would view himself as having the legitimate authority to bind the United States to the defense of Georgia's territorial integrity (at least if one takes Article V of NATO seriously). [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
Friedman, The Jurisprudence of Sport: Sports and Games as Legal Systems (West Publishing 2021). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
How can the Tam Court actually resist saying that trademarks are a form of commercial speech, when it previously held in Friedman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Ambassador to Israel David Friedman participated in the discussions. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Anti-SLAPP Law The anti-SLAPP law provides that "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
