Search for: "Fry v. Fry"
Results 41 - 60
of 501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
Direct links to published decisions: FRY V. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
The Court will then hear one hour of oral argument in Fry v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:29 am
Fry, 2008 Wash. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:10 pm
The Case: Sports Warehouse, Inc. v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 664The Venue: The Federal Court of AustraliaJudge: Kenny JCommentThe Trade Marks Act allows the registration of trade marks with low levels of distinctiveness where sufficient use is shown by the applicant and where that is as a trade mark in the course of trade. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:53 am
Fry, and Lafler v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
(See below *)(Yes, yes, we know that it is OK to split infinitives, but that doesn't mean we can't get a little humor-mileage out of them when they pop up, so to speak, especially when frying chips.)State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:44 pm
The Court also rejected Fry's argument that AEDPA and the Court's 2003 decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:20 pm
The court heard argument this week in: Fry v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
Small Fry Beginnings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:37 am
In Fry v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Fry. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:47 am
The Supreme Court just granted review in the Wonder the Goldendoodle case (credit to Amy Howe for pointing out Wonder’s participation), and the name of the case listed on the court docket — “FRY, STACY, ET VIR V. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Fry v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm
Fry. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
Fry. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 5:08 am
On Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Fry v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 12:10 pm
FRY V. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
In Fry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Fry v. [read post]
