Search for: "G T Development "
Results 41 - 60
of 3,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
T 79/91 [2.2-2.5], and T 246/91, point 7 (both not published in OJ). [1.8] In connection with the interpretation of R 57a EPC 1973 (now R 80) [the patent proprietor] referred to decisions T 1138/02, T 181/02, T 223/97, T 610/95, G 1/84, G 9/93, and G 1/05. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
Commissioner Lynne G. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
These decisions have been issued on 9 December 2010, ie. after the date of filing of the statement of grounds.[5] Using the discretionary power conferred to it by Article 12(4) RPBA the Board, considering that this explanation justifies the late raising of the objection under A 53(b) in the appeal procedure, decides to admit the objection.[6] The [opponent] argues that it applies the conclusion reached by the EBA in decisions G 2/07 and G 1/08 (with regard to processes for the… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:19 am
One thing the proposed rule doesn’t address, at least to my eyes, is how this change will affect existing 8(a) mentor/protégé relationships. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:30 pm
Your account number may also be on the form: the number is optional and doesn’t affect your return. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:50 am
Okay… For starters, I knew that I knew n o t h i n g. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
According to this approach disclaimers which exclude subject-matter disclosed as an embodiment of the invention are regarded as non-disclosed disclaimers and held unallowable unless they fall under one of the exceptions laid down in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03. [42] In T 1050/99 considerable weight is placed on a passage in G 1/03 [2.5] concerning disclaimers which exclude non-working embodiments. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
” P&G argued that doctors could recommend Align based on their independent judgment, but P&G developed the probiotic and the campaign that promoted it to doctors. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
By interlocutory decision T 557/13 dated 17 July 2015, Technical Board 3.3.06 referred the following questions of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (further: Enlarged Board) under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:"1. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:28 pm
Statement Regarding Clemency Application ofJohn G. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:19 am
Note that you can’t say no on this one, so I don’t suggest trying to write in a “no” answer. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Edward T. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:33 am
The development in Daytona... [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:33 am
The development in Daytona... [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions G 9/92 [12] and G 4/93 [1]). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
Richard G. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm
You don’t have to take my word for it. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
Mentors and protégés can also—but don’t have to—form a joint venture relationship to pursue one or more contracts. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:01 pm
[…]Request for referral to the EBA of Appeal (EBA)[5] The appellant requested that, in the event of any of the main request or auxiliary requests 1 and 2 not being granted, three questions be referred to the EBA (in the following “referral questions”) as a divergence existed between, on one hand, decisions T 472/88 and T 975/94 and on the other hand T 868/04 and T 725/08. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Edward T. [read post]
