Search for: "G. Warner"
Results 41 - 60
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 6:13 am
Mike Allen's Tuesday "Playbook" is full of Supercommittee tidbits --bike rides between John Kerry, Rob Portman, and Mark Warner. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:30 am
It’s almost like AT&T buying Time Warner for $86Billion….another surprise this morning! [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:07 pm
Mar. 3, 2008) (per curiam), aff'g Desiano v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm
Readers will recall that the judgments concerned Warner-Lambert’s Swiss-style claims for the use of the compound pregabalin (marketed as Lyrica) in the treatment of pain. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:01 pm
” She was joined by Justices Stephen G. [read post]
21 May 2008, 6:07 am
Senate yesterday backed Associate Justice G. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:30 pm
The Warner and Sony waivers deal with some of these other aspects of the statutory license. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am
In Part 2, she focused on the EPO decision in G 2/21, and the way the Court of Appeal sought to reconcile that decision with Warner-Lambert. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
G 2/21 The Court of Appeal provided some interesting obiter observations on the EBA’s decision in G 2/21: First, Lord Justice Arnold opined that the majority approach in Warner-Lambert corresponds to the “ab initio plausibility” test identified in the referral decision underlying G 2/21 (T 116/18 Sumitomo), whereas that of the minority corresponds to the “ab initio implausibility” test. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:23 am
Naturally, Lessig is going to fight, which I assume begins with a counter-notification under Section 512(g)(3) of the DMCA. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 10:00 am
David G. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:31 am
Contents include:Daniel Warner, Vera and the (Re)Turn to AestheticsGeorges Abi-Saab, The Security Council Legibus Solutus? [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
David G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
The Court of Appeal in Sandoz v BMS attempts to reconcile the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21, and the landmark UK Supreme Court decision on plausibility Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am
But we are happy to see decisions of interest to this blog’s readers issuing once again, including a brand new opinion from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:45 am
g=139de4a9-68fd-48ec-bd04-b6956dd80dfc / Decision of the 11th Civil Chamber of the Court of Appeals, 2013/8293 E, 2014/13652 K. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:30 pm
Warner. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 8:16 am
Steinmeyer, Katherine G. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 12:13 pm
Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
Quill and Franklin G. [read post]
