Search for: "GATTUSO"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Commission, 175 Cal. 91, 92, 165 P. 15, 15 (1917) (reciting former § 1965, as enacted) and Gattuso v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:41 am
The California Supreme Court recently addressed employee travel expense reimbursement in a case titled Gattuso v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 6:56 pm
However, just last year, the California Supreme Court ruled in Gattuso v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:24 am
Gattuso analyze the CPSC Reform Act, S. 2663 (the update to S. 2045). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:06 pm
, (last visited January 21, 2008). 10See Susan Crawford, Why the Digital Transition, Susan Crawford Blog, (last visited January 21, 2008), see alsoHansell, supra note 5. 11 Pear, Robert, BipartisanSenate Group Seeks to Lift Late Fee on Medicare Drug Plan, New York Times, May 17, 2006. 12 Medicare Rights Center, Medicare Statistics: The Medicare Population, (last visited January 21,2008). 13 Pew Internet & American Life Project,Who’sOnline, (last visited January 21, 2008). 14 Id.… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
However, this year, the California Supreme Court ruled in Gattuso v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
However, under the recent Gattuso decision, the IRS standard mileage rate may not conclusively establish compliance with Section 2802. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:03 am
However, this year, the California Supreme Court ruled in Gattuso v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:56 am
Remember, though, that the California Supreme Court in the Gattuso decision (discussed here) did not endorse the IRS standard mileage rate as conclusively adequate under section 2802. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:47 am
California Supreme Court Approves Compensation Practice of Using Clearly Delineated Lump-Sum Payments for Reimbursing Employee Expenses On November 5, 2007, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Gattuso v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Last week, in Gattuso v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:03 pm
Gattuso. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 6:28 pm
In Gattuso v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:09 pm
Long, Jr.Earlier this week, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Gattuso v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:57 pm
Gattuso Does Not Change Much Gattuso does not really change anything under California law, except in clarifying that this “lump sum” payment method is indeed legal. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Instead, the opinion is helpful because it does not bind the employer to a specific method of reimbursement.The case is Gattuso v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:54 am
In October 2005, in Gattuso v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
The Supreme Court issued the following notice: GATTUSO (FRANK) v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
We've heard from a few people who attended Thursday's Supreme Court oral argument in Gattuso v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
Tomorrow, the court will hear a long-anticipated argument in the wage and hour case Gattuso et al. v. [read post]
