Search for: "GIVENS v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 53,342
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:49 pm
MEC for the Department of Health Free State Province v G.A.K obo M.A.K (2795/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 142 (25 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
Given the number of groups (and states) eager to sue federal agencies, there is ample opportunity for mischief. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
The Tribunal held that the obligation is one of “due diligence” and the standard “is stringent, given the high risks of serious and irreversible harm to the marine environment” from greenhouse gas emissions (para. 243). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
See Leslie v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
” Coates v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:42 am
They also argued that the landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that the EEOC relied upon, Bostock v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
Comment We will see if Sovereign appeal further, although given the Court of Appeal’s decision Avon Ground Rents v Canary Gateway, it would be hard to revisit the definition of ‘long lease’. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
This provision ensures that the state with the closest connection to the child is given priority in deciding custody matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a significant ruling in Naranjo v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:46 am
Laird v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
As NRA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:38 pm
In State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:42 am
Given its analysis, the court states: If the goal of the TPM provisions was to allow copyright owners the ability to unilaterally not only to alter the balance, but to change it completely in the face of the state of copyright law, the expectation can only be that Parliament would have said so. [read post]
