Search for: "GLOSSIP v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am
Although she never wrote a sweeping opinion concluding that the death penalty in all cases is unconstitutional, her colleague Justice Stephen Breyer in 2015 wrote a dissenting opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Other studies compare one place over time, when many states had the death penalty (for example, before Furman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:50 pm
Perez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm
This is the attitude that the Supreme Court denounced in the Glossip and Bucklew decisions. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Attacks on that protocol have largely failed, see Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
Rees and 2015’s Glossip v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
In 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:57 am
A majority did embrace that concept in 2015, in the case of Glossip v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
In Bucklew v Precythe, 587 U.S. ____ (2019), a divided U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Rees and Glossip v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Rees and Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
” And in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:35 am
Supreme Court case of Bucklew v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of mitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:09 am
The death penalty case Glossip v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:22 pm
Supreme Court three years ago in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:53 pm
In the ruling, the court clarified that the claimants did not meet the burden established by the Supreme Court in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
