Search for: "GRANT v. MATHIS"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
Savrin of the Atlanta law firm of Freeman Mathis & Gary, with twenty-minutes of time. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Claim in Brent v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Yarborough v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
The reasons for revocation are limited to added subject-matter in respect of granted claim 1 (alternative claims submitted during the hearing by Nestec were not admitted into the proceedings). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Seuss Enterprises, LP v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 10:07 am
ACTi Corporation, Inc., 5-12-cv-00695 (TXWD August 9, 2013, Order) (Mathy, M.J.). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
In Mathis v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
Mathis v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:58 pm
Our preview of the September term of the Illinois Supreme Court continues with EMC Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:17 pm
Mathis, 859 F.2d 223 (D.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:44 am
Mathis, the D.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Justice Kagan questioned whether the state court opinions had failed to follow Mathis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:12 am
The court (same judge) granted Mathis' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:46 pm
The Court has granted cert in Martel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
While the discretion granted to a trial court under section 285 is broad, it is not unbridled. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
”Supreme Court granted Mathis’ petition, annulled the appointing authority's determination and reinstated him to in his former position with back pay. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
