Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Arizona v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
United States Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
April 23, 2024 Department of State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
United States scheduled for April 24, 2024. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Ct. 2183, 2192 (2020); United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
” But in 2021, in Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In my forthcoming book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I explore the evolution of free speech in the United States, including the failure of the Supreme Court to protect free speech during periods of political unrest. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Canada On 18 March 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted leave to the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings to clarify the words that they allege are defamatory in the case of Thmbran v The British Columbia Co [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
Under Trump, explains the Mandate for Leadership, the Department of Justice should prosecute drug manufacturers and providers who supply abortion pills. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
” The court provided some examples — noting that “state law might grant a high-ranking official like the director of the state department of transportation broad responsibility for the state highway system that, in context, includes authority to make official announcements on that subject. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
