Search for: "GRAVES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) affirmed. [read post]
“Impeachment for conduct that destroys or gravely impairs presidential legitimacy. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
District Court for the District of Columbia found that ICE was using a check-box style procedure to deny bond to respondents based solely on broad criteria, such as recency of entry, that naturally swept up everyone in custody. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
District Court for the District of Columbia to disclose sealed grand jury records relating to the Watergate investigation to the House Judiciary Committee outside of the strict bounds of Rule 6(e). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Relevant BibliographiesThe History, Theory & Praxis of the Left in the 1960s [read post]