Search for: "GREEN v. CAMPBELL"
Results 41 - 60
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
The court in Bleistein v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
The unique digital works ranged from a Birkin covered in the Grinch’s green fur to one depicting The Starry Night by Van Gogh, among other bright and colorful patterns. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Great Minds v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
Kienitz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Next up is Campbell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Jesse V. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Green, 327 S.W.3d 859, 863 (Tex. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In reaching this conclusion the Court of Appeal indicated that it was content to assume that a person’s right to protect his/her reputation was among the rights guaranteed by Article 8 ECHR (see Greene [68]). [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:55 am
”); see also most recently Oil States Energy Services, LLC, v Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 584 US ___ at 17 (2018) (noting decision “should not be misconstrued as suggesting that patents are not property for purposes of the Due Process Clause or the Takings Clause”). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
Two years after the Koons case, the Supreme Court recast fair use in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners) Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and ADIORABLE:… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Accompanying said tweet was a snap of a shop frontage in familiar dark green and white livery, an iconic 'siren' logo, and the words DUMB STARBUCKS COFFEE emblazoned across the entrance.As the word spread, further details began to emerge. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
”[1] The most recent Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision interpreting this “further processing exclusion,” Bridges v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 233, 240 [1984]; Matter of Adirondack Council, Inc. v Adirondack Park Agency, 92 AD3d 188, 191 [2012]; Matter of Wal-Mart Stores v Campbell, 238 AD2d 831, 832-833 [1997]). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004), and confirmed in Hill v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
See, e.g., Campbell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
Campbell, 359 N.C. 644, 617 S.E.2d 1 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2005) (quoting Floridav. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
N/K/A LUMINANT ENERGY COMPANY, LLC Get your green energy on. [read post]
