Search for: "GROSS v GROSS"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
For example, lump-sum alimony or alimony in gross normally would be paid even if the recipient remarries. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
For example, lump-sum alimony or alimony in gross normally would be paid even if the recipient remarries. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a 501(c)(4).[21] Despite the… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:01 am
In OG v AG [2020] the court has gone further to state that conduct should be taken into account, not just where it is unjust, but also where the impact is financially measurable. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm
District Court Judge Rosemary Márquez held that Mexico could proceed with its claims of negligence, negligent entrustment, gross negligence, unjust enrichment, and demand for punitive damages. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm
District Court Judge Rosemary Márquez held that Mexico could proceed with its claims of negligence, negligent entrustment, gross negligence, unjust enrichment, and demand for punitive damages. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:21 am
From my prior post: It is well established that standing is not dispensed in gross. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
For the past several years, I have assigned the 2013 decision in LSUC v Melnick as required reading to the upper-year students in my Legal Ethics class at Osgoode. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:16 pm
Referring to the principles of primary jurisdiction and exhaustion outlined in Lee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
Entities (i) with greater than 20 employees, (ii) that file Federal income tax returns demonstrating gross receipts or sales exceeding $5,000,000, and (iii) having a physical office in the United States are also exempt from the Proposed Rule. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:16 am
From Fink v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
The fact that the Fifth Circuit could pass by such gross distortions and continue on without questioning the pattern of other similar distortions by the district court is a stain on the judicial system. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:54 am
Gross receipts or sales exceeding $5,000,000 domestically, as reported on the previous year’s tax return. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
In more rural areas, the county attorney’s office for that jurisdiction will prosecute the petty misdemeanors, misdemeanors, and gross misdemeanors that occur within the cities, townships, and municipalities. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
