Search for: "Garland, in Re"
Results 41 - 60
of 759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2017, 9:13 am
[1] The Republicans were wrong in what they did to Garland, and the Democrats were right that this kind of behavior is damaging to the Supreme Court as an institution. [2] Blocking a nominee for a year when you have a majority of the Senate is one thing; blocking any appointment for four years when you’re in the minority is much less feasible (and more damaging to the court). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 6:50 am
Yes, but we’re glad you’re back. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
His brief comments had all of the substance of a Hallmark card that read, “Trust us, we’re the government. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:00 am
Res Ipsa yesterday passed the 58,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
Supreme Court.In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct, 769 F.3d 762 (Aug. 12, 2014). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The complaint alleged that in September, Russell left a voicemail for the official saying, “The only reason you’re still walking around . . . is because we’re waiting for the midterms . . . . [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Roberts Jr. as saying, “any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
Yesterday, Res Ipsa passed the 61,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports on the factors that might lead to Garland’s confirmation if Hillary Clinton wins in November, including the prospect of Senate action in a lame-duck session and the possibility that “if Clinton were to win, she may not want to engage in an immediate battle royale over the Supreme Court,” but might instead re-nominate the “eminently qualified” Garland and wait for other opportunities to dramatically reshape the… [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
That would leave it to the committee to re-subpoena him, with the DOJ retaining the option to indict him if he continued his defiance.While that remains a possible course for Attorney General Garland, the committee’s new filing makes crystal clear why the case for indicting Meadows was always strong and remains so. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
Garland additionally said he would “expect to re-up” those guidelines, though he shares our understanding that they weren’t rescinded or amended by the Trump Justice Department. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 8:56 pm
[Garland's dilemma.] [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:48 am
” Garland is having multilevel law enforcement meetings as if parents truly are domestic terrorists, like the National School Boards Association said we were. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
” See In re Richmond, 26 I. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:57 am
Rather, it relied on a strained understanding of a cause of action based on In re Debs. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:25 am
Were I Hillary Clinton I'd be inclined to simply re-nominate Judge Garland, but there are other intriguing possibilities. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:09 am
They're doing their "investigation" in public — straining to make it as public as possible and presenting it to the nation as an ongoing TV show — and pontificating about the rule of law. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
She asked the SG "But you're trying to save, like, the [Garland v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:39 pm
They're already dead. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:00 pm
The most likely outcome is that Garland would appoint a special counsel to investigate, and even prosecute Trump, as Biden runs for re-election. [read post]
