Search for: "Gene Grant"
Results 41 - 60
of 994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 6:53 am
As posted by Dennis Crouch of Patently-O, Supreme Court has Granted Cert in the Myriad Case, Question: Are Human Genes Patentable. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:43 pm
Patent claims on isolated DNA violate the First Amendment because they amount to a grant of exclusive control over a body of knowledge. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
A practice like granting and enforcing patents on human genes should truly be left in the dustbin of history. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 8:45 pm
By Donald Zuhn --- Rosetta Genomics, Ltd. announced on July 31, 2007 that it had been granted U.S. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:27 pm
The ACLU, representing dozens of patients and researchers, said the case challenges the legality and constitutionality of granting patents covering the “most basic element of every person’s individuality. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:39 pm
The USPTO granted patents to Myriad Genetics and the Utah Research Foundation for the BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 genes. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
Myriad: SCOTUS Must Remember What Case Is Not About*As Myriad has correctly pointed out in its brief in opposition to the grant of certiorari, the question posed by the ACLU/PubPat (“Are Human Genes Patentable”) is absolutely the wrong one to answer: “The first question presented [by the ACLU/PubPat] bears no relation to the uncontroverted facts of this case. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:59 am
Or will it revert back to granting patents that can prevent scientists from working with basic building blocks of nature, as urged by industry groups? [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 10:24 am
YOU, or someone you love, may die because of a gene patent that should never have been granted in the first place. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:42 am
Clapper, 638 F.3d 118 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. granted, Clapper v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
“The social costs of the exclusive rights to inventions granted by patents are normally justified by the incentives that patents provide for self-interested entities to invest in research and development and generate the socially valuable inventions,” Collins says. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
Myriad: SCOTUS Must Remember What Case Is Not About*As Myriad has correctly pointed out in its brief in opposition to the grant of certiorari, the question posed by the ACLU/PubPat (“Are Human Genes Patentable”) is absolutely the wrong one to answer: “The first question presented [by the ACLU/PubPat] bears no relation to the uncontroverted facts of this case. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:05 am
The Human Genome is OURS not theirs: Gene Patents Should be Void on their Face Let us say, prior to our comments about In re Kubin, that we think that gene patents should be void and voided by legislation as a matter of public policy, including all gene patents thus far granted. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:09 am
On 15 June 2011, the Senate granted the Committee an extension of time for reporting, until 25 August 2011. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm
The practice of granting private companies control over crucial information about our own bodies is wrong. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
Authored by: Gene Grant As published in The Daily Journal of Commerce Vacancy rates for commercial space, already high, continue to increase. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm
The court granted the USPTO's request that it be released as a defendant in the lawsuit. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm
Having received over 100 written submissions, and conducted two days of public hearings, the Senate granted the Committee an extension of time for reporting, until 25 August 2011 (see Update on the Australian Senate Gene Patent Inquiry). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
Given that backdrop, she concluded that it was up to Congress to determine whether gene patents should be granted. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:05 am
Harvill Gene Blackshere: The Court granted the defendant's petition for discretionary review without oral argument in this Brown County possession of a controlled substance case on the following issue:Whether the Court of Appeals had any jurisdiction to hear the States [sic] Appeal.For a detailed summary of the underlying case click here.PD-1611-08, Gabriel Lemell Prudholm v. [read post]
