Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 41 - 60
of 723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
The justices will consider Tingley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
Oregon, where the Court “considered the ‘idea that Congress gave [the Attorney General] such broad and unusual authority through an implicit delegation … not sustainable. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm
In any event, by 1980—a few years after Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Mitchell (1980). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
By the time the ADA and FHA were passed in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s testing was very widely used by civil rights organizations to find and prosecute discriminatory conduct and had the imprimatur of the Supreme Court in the Havens case. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT REMOVAL What is the basis for removing a state prosecution to federal court? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:03 am
I can attest with some confidence that people are very confused about the relevant classifications, but for now I will just point out that some of the Justices themselves are confused, including Sotomayor. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Doe (9th Cir. 1980) (prison inmates). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
But while the case is being litigated, they are generally merely accused. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
He served as law clerk to Supreme Court Justice William J. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
Much like in Brackeen, the Court's conservatives are simply ignoring Justice Gorsuch on Indian law. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
After the Supreme Court upheld the law’s constitutionality, Nixon filed a separate lawsuit in 1980 demanding compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
But one other interesting thing about it is that it reaffirmed the validity of a 1980 case called Maine v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
” Under the Supreme Court’s precedent in Matal v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
We all should wonder why it happened without much opposition from this diverse United States.The 1970s and 1980s Are the Seedbed for the Current Supreme Court’s Conservative MakeupIn 1971, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court decision in Coit v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
And of course, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed this, for instance in Harris v. [read post]
