Search for: "Ghent v. Ghent"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 4:26 am
In its judgment of 15 March 2022 in the case of OOO Memo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm
In Pryanishnikov v Russia ([2019] ECHR 614), a case concerning the authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant a film reproduction license, the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to freedom of expression, as the only reason advanced by the domestic courts for the refusal of the relevant license had been based on mere suspicions rather than findings of fact. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
Haggenmacher & V. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:54 am
The judgment of the Grand Chamber in the case of Pentikäinen v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:27 am
A Commentary on the Law Applicable to Divorce and Legal Separation, pp v-242 (Elgar, 2020). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
United Kingdom and Delfi AS v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:52 pm
In MTE and Index.hu Zrt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 am
In Pihl v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:03 pm
Slovakia and Dupuis v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am
The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands” • Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule” • Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding” • Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition” • Karl Härter,… [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands” • Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule” • Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding” • Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition” • Karl Härter,… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:17 pm
A critical post on the Chamber judgment in Delfi AS v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Referring to Axel Springer AG v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
Ghent University, Belgium. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm
Likewise, pouring paint on statues of Ataturk has been considered as an expressive act performed as a protest against the Turkish political regime at the time (see Murat Vural v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
(See Cashion v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Hence, Google relies on Kelly v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
In the case of Chopak v. [read post]