Search for: "Gilstrap v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Let me share just one more observation for now: Apple tries hard to distinguish its case from HTC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
This Tuesday, the Mannheim Regional Court gave short shrift to Deutsche Telekom v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am
The case itself--Solas OLED v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:02 pm
[I could use a few more judges — you can sign-up via doodle; or contact my Teaching Assistant Homayoon Rafatijo] This year’s case is based directly on Judge Gilstrap’s recent patent eligibility decision in Mad Dogg Athletics v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:18 am
Gunn v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
What Ericsson is asking for is FRAND, not only in my opinion but simply in light of a recent decision by the Fifth Circuit in HTC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:40 am
The Texas damage award was then reversed in April 2021 by US District Judge Rodney Gilstrap who emphasized the question of whether the royalty was consistent with FRAND terms, leading to a retrial (Optis Wireless Technology v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
On April 9, the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA) filed an amicus brief in Ericsson Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
• Frank Gilstrap, 78, of Austin, died January 17, 2021. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 1:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 6:29 am
Rodney Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm
In my last post of the year 2020, I criticized rather harshly the overreaching nature of Judge Rodney Gilstrap's temporary restraining order (TRO) in Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am
The first ASI issued by a Wuhan court was in the Xiaomi v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:21 am
., New Year's Day, Ericsson amended the complaint by also bringing eight patent infringement assertions (this post continues below the document):21-01-01 Ericsson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
Robart's legendary Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:58 am
Tracy Nixon v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am
Daimler patent trial: no masks, no minimum distanceCOVID prevention rules must outweigh judicial independence as superspreader patent judges are out of controlIn Judge Gilstrap's Eastern COVID of Texas, patent trolls trump public health concerns: PanOptis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 3:48 am
United States District Judge Robert W. [read post]
