Search for: "Givens v. Miller" Results 41 - 60 of 1,994
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
  The agencies have given me much to kvetch about (thanks?). [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:21 am by Lara Jayne Davies
In Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane (2006), the Supreme Court articulated the principles of needs, compensation, and sharing as applied to both matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and  Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
”And that’s where we need to end that.# # #DECISIONTower 570 Co., L.P. v Miller & Wrubel P.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:18 am by jonathanturley
Spears has given public statements and is a sports sensation. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
You may wonder how this is possible, given that Barrie died in 1937—over 86 years ago. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Aamer Madhani and Zeke Miller report for AP News. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
(Given that a local government, in furtherance of the “public’s right of travel,” is “permitted to maintain and improve” a public highway and may lawfully extend beyond the existing width by “at least three rods” -- or 49.5 feet -- the AD4 thought that GF alternatively needed to show that the lawful limit had been exceeded.)Now that’s our cue to hit the road ….# # #DECISIONGF v Town of Lorraine [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
McEleny argued that Sunak should not have made the joke given the ongoing police investigation into the SNP’s finances. [read post]