Search for: "Glass v. US" Results 41 - 60 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 of this request read:Use of a silicate compound of the formula KuNavAlwCaxMgySiOz wherein […] u, v and w, independently range from about 0 to about 0.5; x and y independently range from about 0.1 to about 0.6; and z is a value which balances the formula; in a method for preparing a glass composition, said method comprising forming a batch of glass-forming components by admixing the said silicate; a volatile component source containing a volatile selected… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:48 am
  And Grant's not allowed to drink alcohol, but has ordered a large glass of sake.So this joke ends with Grant getting two years in federal prison.Grant ultimately gets a reversal from the Ninth Circuit, which was required due to the Supreme Court's recent decision in Tapia. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm by Joe Mullin
Google case patent show us, more broadly? [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Glass’s possession of methamphetamine for his personal use, as evidenced by the residue in his pipe, is a distinct and separate prosecutable offense. . . . [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:06 am by Jon Gelman
US Supreme Court Upholds Equitable Tolling In Reimbursement MatterSebelius v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 2:30 pm
This patent focused on an optimized emitter paste using carbon nanotubes, diamond and other components. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm by Larry
Dependable Packaging Solutions v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 6:20 pm
Sleeman Breweries has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Dead Frog Brewery over Dead Frog’s use of a clear glass bottle design, in association with its beer. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:38 pm by Miller Legal Services
Clinch County Glass, Inc., the Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that punitive damages are not allowed simply because using a cell phone caused an accident. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm by Larry
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]