Search for: "Goings v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 52,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered arguments in the case of Defense for Children International–Palestine v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice Roberts gave the traditional toast ("To the President of the United States"). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
In Pennsylvania, a case now at that state’s Supreme Court, Penncrest School District v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowed the lawsuit to go forward, prompting Facebook to go to the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
On 5 June 2024, the Competition Appeal Tribunal certified the claim and allowed it to go to trial, dismissing Google’s arguments against it. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” The proposed amendments, if adopted in the current legislative session, would go into effect on August 1, 2024. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
To answer that question, it is necessary to go back and understand how the statutory presumption actually came about, to think about what it does and does not do, and to analyse what is really going on when courts are making decisions about contact against a backdrop of proven domestic abuse. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]