Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 41 - 60 of 523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:36 pm by Katherine L. Aizawa
Commissioner, TC Memo 2017-139, illustrates why it is good practice to verify that employee loan repayments have been timely deducted. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Dean Zerbe
Dean Zerbe Tax Court in a recent decision – “Whistleblower 10949-13W v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  He was due to be murdered by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction on June 10. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:01 am by Amanda Sanders
The amendments are mainly to reflect the Court of Appeal’s decisions in the recent cases of Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 74 and Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd and Deer v University of Oxford [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:55 am by Amanda Sanders
The amendments are mainly to reflect the Court of Appeal’s decisions in the recent cases of Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 74 and Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd and Deer v University of Oxford [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
And finally, “The majority is correct that, as a practical matter, the government has the ability to extort that to which it is not entitled under law. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 12:59 pm
  And who have adequate incentives to still write really good briefs that allow us full information to decide the merits. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:33 pm
Settlement Agreements and good advice on how to draft confidentiality provisions:In the recent case Amos v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "The petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]