Search for: "Gorsuch" Results 41 - 60 of 7,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
Justice Alito’s dissent (which was joined by Justice Gorsuch) reached the exact opposite result and would have affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Only Justices Alito and Gorsuch found that the funding structure of the CFPB was unconstitutional. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:23 am by bklemm@foley.com
Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch, which argued that the funding statute for the CFPB allows the CFPB to operate “without any congressional control or oversight,” and argued that the Court misinterpreted the Appropriations Clause. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am by Michael C. Dorf
If it comes, I think there are likely to be at least six Justices on the pro-liquidation side, with at most three liquidation skeptics (Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Alito-Gorsuch dissent made a little noise toward the "mosaic theory" of CFPB constitutional infirmity, meaning that even if no single feature of the CFPB is constitutionally fatal, the constellation of unique features is in concert nonetheless offensive. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Anagha Vasudevarao
” Justice Alito, joined by Justice Gorsuch, filed a dissenting opinion, arguing that the drafters of the Constitution would be “shocked, even horrified” by the funding mechanism and that the CFPB is granted far too much financial independence. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:55 am by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, in an opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
[And what would have happened if Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch did not vote to grant the stay?] [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm by Aaron Moss
” Justice Gorsuch, dissenting from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
Justice Gorsuch concurred, but raised concerns about “whether, and to what extent, contemporary civil forfeiture practices can be squared with the Constitution’s promise of due process. [read post]
The dissent, penned by Justice Neil Gorsuch, argued that the discovery rule does not apply in this case because it ordinarily applies only “in cases of fraud or concealment. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm by Thomas James
Justices Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito dissented. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am by Dennis Crouch
As the dissent by Justice Gorsuch notes, this is a big caveat for the case, and there is some likelihood that in a separate case the court will entirely eliminate the discovery accrual rule. [read post]