Search for: "Governing Board v. Brennan" Results 41 - 60 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
” The editorial board of the New York Times weighs in on AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
But if you go back and read the cases, that narrative — pushed most strongly by justice Brennan in Warden v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
In today’s Washington Post, Ruth Marcus devotes her column to the new biography of Justice Brennan, Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
As Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School explains, nonmatches result from faulty information in databases and typographical errors by government officials, not voter ineligibility. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Boards of directors should have taken action long before now against CEOs who refuse to recognize this threat to their business. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times focuses on Kiobel, as do Daniel Fisher of Forbes, the Brennan Center’s Faiza Patel and Emin Akopyan, and James Vicini of Reuters. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Kali Borkoski
Taylor, Jr. for the Brennan Center for Justice and Gary Scharrer of the Houston Chronicle. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Circuit Judge Merrick Garland clerked for Judge Henry Friendly on the Second Circuit and then for Justice William Brennan. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The Act establishes a data protection board and empowers the government “to request information from companies and to issue orders to block content. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians — authority of Indian tribal court to try a case against a non-Indian business Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
The editorial board of The Washington Times weighs in on Arab Bank v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall also viewed the clergy-disqualification provision as problematic because “it establishes a religious classification – involvement in protected religious activity – governing the eligibility for office. [read post]