Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Company v. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Those regulations require large- and medium-sized companies to offer their employees health insurance that covers contraception, or else face stiff financial penalties. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Frank V. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
Verner (1963), Thomas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
A health insurance company may pay for a patient’s operation, but the insurer does not participate in the operation at the hospital. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:36 am
Schutte v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
And as I understand the college and university exception, it assures employees coverage for the contraceptives through the insurance companies, though with no direct payment for it by the employers; that exception thus wouldn’t implicate either interest. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Wade, taking on Griswold v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
She rejected their argument that sending a form to their insurance company or the government triggered insurance coverage of the disapproved contraceptives. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
There is minimal or no cost to insurance companies from providing the contraceptive coverage separately to employees of such religious institutions. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 07a0400p.06 2007/10/01 Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Smith, 263 F.3d 571 (U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
Smith wisely concluded was better left closed. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 7:43 am
Smith. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
The implications for insurers D&O insurers should assess the climate-related risks to insureds based on governance issues, continuous disclosure obligations and the insured’s interactions with institutional investors. [read post]
