Search for: "Government Employees v. Windsor"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
Windsor, the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Windsor and DOMA. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In its 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
(United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
Windsor, the federal government did not recognize same sex marriages. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
The same constitutional principle of equal protection applied to same-sex couples in Latta applies with equal force to public employees in government workplaces. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Moore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
In addition, governments and businesses now know that their constituents and employees will continue to suffer under the nation’s patchwork approach to marriage rights for the foreseeable future. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Place of Celebration to Govern Under the current FMLA regulations, the definition of spouse is based on the state where the employee resides, not on the state where the employee was married. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:11 pm
That much was made clear in the Supreme Court of Canada decision Caimaw v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
DOJ reports on post-Windsor efforts. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm
Windsor. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:33 am
The case is called Boucher v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 2675 2013). [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
Windsor, 570 U.S. [read post]
