Search for: "Gramme v. Gramme"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2018, 3:55 pm
Lanclos v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 3:55 pm
Lanclos v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:05 am
Posted by V. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:05 am
Posted by V. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Covered entities that are subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as expanded by the Health Information Technology for Clinical and Economic Health Act, are exempt from the law. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
The outcome of a case called PHH v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:02 am
The headlines look pretty bad: the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held the CFPB's structure to be unconstitutional in a case call PHH v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm
The FTC promulgated the Safeguards Rule in 2002, implementing Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), which required federal agencies to establish standards for the administrative, technical, and physical safeguards employed by financial institutions for certain information. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:08 pm
Carpenter, Legislative Attorney; Edward V. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Over at Concurring Opinions, Tuan Samahon, Villanova Law, draws upon Judge Oliver Gasch’s in addressing the likelihood that then-Judge Scalia wrote the per curiam for a three-judge district court that Chief Justice Burger drew upon holding the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act unconstitutional in Bowsher v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its opinion in FTC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:41 am
In Peters v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
In Webster v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
FTC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:23 pm
Trade Secrets: Buckley v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
Executing legally sufficient contracts with providers; and v. [read post]
