Search for: "Grand Jury Proceedings--united States, in Re"
Results 41 - 60
of 383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
They’re Trying to Topple Trump. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:11 am
They point to grand jury transcripts, internal memoranda of interviews, or other materials the reader cannot simply click on and search. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:42 am
Lunt proceeded by obtaining grand jury indictments against ten men, including two lawyers, Robert Morris and George Davis. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 7:15 am
The defendant is not present at these proceedings, which are closed to the public, and may not even know they’re going on. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Jurors found all five defendants guilty of obstruction of an official proceeding: Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” In re Franklin Nat. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
For at least two months, all these defendants engaged in or endorsed over-the-top, written and oral threats or promises to “oppose by force the authority” of the United States or to use “force to prevent, hinder and delay the execution of [the] law[s] of the United States” governing the transfer of presidential power—the two clauses of the seditious conspiracy statute under which they have been indicted. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
[N]o freeman, free negro or mulatto, not in the military service of the United States Government, and not licensed so to do by the board of police of his or her county, shall keep or carry fire-arms of any kind, or any ammunition, dirk or bowie knife, and on conviction thereof, in the county court, shall be punished by fine, not exceeding ten dollars, and pay the costs of such proceedings, and all such arms or ammunition shall be forfeited to the informer, and it shall be… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990, 741 F. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:42 pm
In re Grand Jury asks the court to consider whether attorney-client privilege shields communications from grand jury subpoenas. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:14 am
Here is the full list of cases scheduled for the January argument session: In re Grand Jury (Jan. 9): Whether a law firm that specializes in international tax issues must turn over documents that the firm says are protected by the attorney-client privilege, but also contain non-legal advice. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
§3733(i)(3) provides: "(3) USE OF MATERIAL, ANSWERS, OR TRANSCRIPTS IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS- Whenever any attorney of the Department of Justice has been designated to appear before any court, grand jury, or Federal agency in any case or proceeding, the custodian of any documentary material answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony received under this section may deliver to such attorney such material, answers, or transcripts for official… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
In re Grand Jury is a case involving grand jury subpoenas and attorney-client privilege. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:56 pm
Other new cases In a case known as In re Grand Jury, the justices will weigh in on grand jury subpoenas ordering an unnamed law firm that specializes in international tax issues to turn over documents that the firm says are protected from disclosure. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 6:05 am
That’s why we’re providing a detailed overview of Lawfare’s coverage of the various ways in which the government, individuals, and entities have responded to Jan. 6. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Trump Lawyers Argue to Limit White House Aides’ Testimony to Jan. 6 Grand Jury MSN – Jacqueline Alemany, Spencer Hsu, Devlin Barrett, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 9/23/2022 Lawyers for former President Trump have entered a high-stakes legal battle seeking to limit the scope of former top White House aides’ testimony to a federal grand jury that is investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 elections. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:23 am
That means the judge or jury can infer from a witness’ invocation that the answer they would have given would have been damaging to their case. [read post]