Search for: "Grant et al v. Ford Motor Company" Results 41 - 54 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 1:37 pm by Heidi Meinzer
In March, the Court accepted the petition for appeal in Ford Motor Credit Company v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-297 Title: Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:44 am
Ford Motor Company et al"A manufacturer of a component product is liable for harm caused by the absence of a safety device in a finished product where it was feasible and practical for the device to have been installed at the time the component product was within the control of the manufacturer. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
Pyett, et al., 07-581). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IPBiz),Eco-patent commons meets open innovation: (Securing Innovation),Settle the patent infringement case by selling your company? [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Huron Valley Steel, Reading Company, and Cooper Industries (the petitioner in a predecessor case, Cooper Industries v. [read post]