Search for: "Grant v. Ratliff" Results 41 - 43 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
NFL (08-661) Argued: Jan. 13, 2010 Issue: Whether NFLP, the NFL, and the teams functioned as a “single entity” when granting the company an exclusive headwear license and therefore could not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1, which requires proof of collective action involving “separate entities. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]