Search for: "Graves v. District of Columbia" Results 41 - 60 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Gregory Ablavsky
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with the federally recognized tribes, holding the definition did not include the corporations. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Rudolph Contreras, but the case was reassigned to Sullivan’s court following Contreras’s recusal.In a subsequent colloquy, Flynn maintained and reiterated his guilty plea. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am by Chris Castle
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) affirmed. [read post]
“Impeachment for conduct that destroys or gravely impairs presidential legitimacy. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am by Samuel B. Friedman, Esq.
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]