Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 1:59 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that T.F. was well settled in the United States and would not order his return to Brazil, It did not reach the issue of whether his return would put T.F. at grave risk of harm. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In  Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In January 2022, when he was not yet four, VAHV was brought to the United States by his mother. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:38 pm by Eric Muller
United States (1943), where the Court upheld a racial curfew? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:35 am by Rick Hasen
Judge Luttig and Laurence Tribe in the Altantic: The Supreme Court of the United States did a grave disservice to both the Constitution and the nation in Trump v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
 In her Answer, Respondent asserted two affirmative defenses: (1) that returning L.T. to Japan would expose L.T. to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm; and (2) that Petitioner consented to and acquiesced in Respondent’s retaining L.T. in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (federal sovereign immunity)* State Courts BulletinCases featured:In re. [read post]