Search for: "Gray et al v. Long et al" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
”12 In reaching its decision, the Court noted [b]ecause the child’s actions are reduced to a recording, the pornography may haunt him in future years, long after the original misdeed took place. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
The personalized medicine industry was able to breathe a collective sigh of relief following the recent unanimous Supreme Court decision in Bilski, et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
Deandre Cortez Way et al (1709 Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions 4th Circuit: Post-purchase confused restroom users: Georgia Pacific Consumer Products v Von Drehle Corporation (The Trademark Blog) TTAB precedential no. 31: Opposer fails to prove priority, non-use, and fraud in BLACK BELT TV brouhaha (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Gray Estate, 2002 BCCA 94, 98 B.C.L.R. (3d) 389, Doucette v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm by Brett Trout
While the Supreme Court takes very few patent cases, if any case has the chops to make it to the bigs, Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]