Search for: "Gray v. Administrative Director of Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 6:59 am
Boyden Gray, former OIRA director Chris DeMuth and BU’s Jack Beermann, among many others (myself included). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
White is counsel with Boyden Gray & Associates, and an adjunct fellow at the Manhattan Institute. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The duty of candor to the tribunal applies to lawyers representing administrative agencies. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The duty of candor to the tribunal applies to lawyers representing administrative agencies. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Under the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
One case that comes to mind is Mehraban v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes reserved judgment in the case of Woodrow v Johansson On 20 January 2012, the Administrative Court handed down judgment in the R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson ([2012] EWHC 57 (Admin)). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Sittenreich, The Rocky Path For Private Directors General: Procedure, Politics, And The Uncertain Future Of Eu Antitrust Damages Actions, 78 Fordham L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Sittenreich, The Rocky Path For Private Directors General: Procedure, Politics, And The Uncertain Future Of Eu Antitrust Damages Actions, 78 Fordham L. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
(Gray on Claims) US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit Panel disagrees over application of Rambus v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
” Since then, no lower court has found a federal grant program to violate South Dakota v. [read post]
