Search for: "Gray v. Lacke" Results 41 - 60 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And the Department denied Gray's license based on the communicative impact of Gray's speech. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 6:43 am by Randall Hodgkinson
DavisWhether lack of knowledge constitutes excusable neglect for untimely motionState v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am by Eleonora Rosati
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As you know, it has long been held that counsel fails to preserve for appellate review legal insufficiency claims when he has failed to raise the issue in a specific TOD motion (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
The protection of intellectual property is at the forefront of agreements between nation-states because of the relative ease of copying, and the lax attitude of some nation-states to prevent and punish infringement.[2] A prevailing argument is the thesis that "technology drives investment" and to the extent that technology is reluctant to flow where it is not protected, the lack of an adequate level of protection could stunt technological transfer and foreign investment… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Gray (2014) 58 Cal.4th 901, 909 (Gray).) [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
Peterson has appealed his case, which is now entitled Peterson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
Peterson has appealed his case, which is now entitled Peterson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R v Chyna Gray and Others Croydon Crown Court, 21 June 2011 My next case is even worse and involves violent physical assault. [read post]