Search for: "Gray v. State of Indiana" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am by SHG
Texas, 539 U.S. 588 (2003) (criminalization of same sex sexual conduct is unconstitutional), United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:35 am
Then Gray sought a pre-habeas petition stay of execution from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, which Senior Judge Rogers granted. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Jeff Carroll
This past summer, I worked as a judicial extern in the chambers of Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Aruba Networks Posted by Brian Broughman (Indiana University), on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Market efficiency, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm by Allie
  Now, either he’s dying those dark locks of hair, or the Italian-stallion in him just keeps the gray away. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 8:20 pm
From the post:In the first, United States v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
The debate reflects the gray area left by the Supreme Court in 2002, when it ruled that the mentally impaired were not eligible for the death penalty but left it up to state courts to interpret which inmates qualified as impaired. [read post]