Search for: "Green Party v. Board of Elections"
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
Moreover, and relatedly, it is directly a result of long-standing Republican efforts to make it harder for anyone not a mindlessly reflexive supporter of their political party to vote, in this case, “harder to naturalize and vote. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
The first of these was a green paper introduced in 1973 by Allan MacEachen, President of the Privy Council. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Yero v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am
Courts have noted that statements made online in blogs or forum boards are more likely to be interpreted as opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
GREEN, Justice. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:35 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Even the new favorite punching bag for right-wingers, the Green New Deal, is hardly a radical document. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
More than at any other point in time, the political establishment fears that EU-skeptical parties may actually form the strongest bloc in the EP after this year's election. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Whistle-blowers on the board? [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm
For example, the law does not require an employer to obtain shareholder approval or consent from a majority of a board of directors (or Senate in the case of a university). [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
The district court granted the party’s motion to require Ohio’s secretary of state to give county election boards either lists of mismatches or a way to identify the mismatches, and the full 6th Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Thapar argued for a rule under which the lower court would be reversed only if it committed plain error, even when neither party asks for that highly deferential standard to apply. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(likely relisted after June 21 conference) Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm
Lopez, about Congress’ Article I powers, and for cases like 2001’s Board of Trustees v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
Commentary comes from the editorial board of the Boston Globe and Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Mark Green, the administrator of the U.S. [read post]
