Search for: "Greene v. Harris et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
American Express Co. et al. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am
[et al.].Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.International Criminal LawKZ6304.5.E94 C66 2010Fact-finding without facts : the uncertain evidentiary foundations of international criminal convictions / Nancy Amoury Combs.Combs, Nancy A., 1965-Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
If the motion is granted, the court of appeals shall reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.MARIA DEL CARMEN GUILBOT SERROS DE GONZALEZ, ET AL. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
Mar. 12, 2010)(illegal immigrant status of defendant's driver in truck-car collision case held prejudicial in jury trial; new trial ordered)TXI TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One current example is the ongoing discussion about the Heidelberg Report2 which proposes to replace the so-called arbitration exception of Article 1 (2)(d) of the Brussels I Regulation (JR) by two new articles which shall address positively the interfaces between arbitration and the Regulation and strengthen arbitration within the European Judicial Area.3 The following article first delineates the background of the present discussion (II), than it briefly presents the proposals of the Heidelberg… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:51 pm
MARGARITA CAMACHO, ET AL.; from Hidalgo County;13th district (13-05-00361-CV, 251 SW3d 88, 01-17-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.Justice Phil Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court [in pdf](Justice Guzman not sitting) [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
Oct. 23, 2009)(per curiam) (opinion on denial of motion for rehearing) (limited discovery prior to arbitration sometimes permissible) IN RE HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, L.P., ET AL.; from Victoria County;13th district (13-07-00299-CV & 13-07-00362-CV, 269SW3d 90, 08-26-08). [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
MARKS v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
This 9th Circuit's reasoning in Douglas was extended in Harris v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
KIM POSEY, ET AL.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01373-CV, 239 SW3d 336, 08-28-07. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end:… [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
EZEQUIEL CASTILLO, ET AL.; from Cameron County; 13th district (13-04-00638-CV, 200 SW3d 217, 06-08-06) The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
