Search for: "Greene v. Municipal Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Meadow Greens Pizza, LLC, et al., No. 5:19-cv-155 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 7:48 am
Burgess v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 7:19 pm
The court noted that in Boucher v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
In Seaman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:47 am
Green of the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan: A farmer was charged with driving in a manner dangerous to the public on Church Road in the Rural Municipality of Fertile Belt, contrary to s. 249(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
” Green v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Google, Green v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
(Justice Green not sitting)SUB-GOVERNMENTAL QUASI-SOVEREIGN IMMUNITYHarris County Hospital District v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Last Term, the Court decided Evenwel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
Feb. 19, 2010)(Johnson)(municipal civil service disciplinary proceeding, judicial review of hearing examiner's decision, jurisdiction issue)CITY OF WACO, TEXAS v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:20 pm
Village Green at Sayville, LLC v Town of Islip, 2019 WL 4737054 (EDNY 9/27/2019) [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:01 am
Four days ago, in Hill v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:17 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Greene’s Energy Group and Impressions Products v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
Green Bay Mississippi Canal Co., 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 166 (1871). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the Supreme Court summarily affirmed Bluman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
