Search for: "Greenwald v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 11:59 am
Clapper, the government acknowledged (in a footnote) that the law "confers authority for collecting the contents of wire communications to or from a person in the United States." [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm
As a Verizon customer myself (and one who has spent most of the time covered in the order outside the United States), I harbor no illusions about which of my records are now in Uncle Sam’s possession. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am
But is Google facilitating that trend on behalf of law enforcement more rapidly in the United States than elsewhere across the globe? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Greenwald, Emily. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Greenwald, Emily. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:11 am
In this case, Hedges v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 6:08 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
"We note that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has released its position -- that it is a fair use for a patent applicant to submit a copy of non-patent art to the patent office to fulfill the disclosure requirement imposed by the patent regulations. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:07 pm
The decision to move from the Data Processing Unit to the Technical Operations Support Unit rested entirely with Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
NPR’s Fresh Air discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm
” Knowing that producing propaganda is not a crime, the FBI explained in its affidavit that Ahmad trained in a Pakistani terrorism camp before traveling to the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:42 pm
The last Gitmo case was Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
