Search for: "Greg Ablavsky"
Results 41 - 58
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Greg Ablavsky[1] Though my graduate school advisors told me that “filling a gap” was not a good justification for a project, Alison LaCroix’s highly significant, wonderfully crafted new book shows that they were wrong. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
Threading this needle was not easy and likely it meant that it took twice as long to write a book that ended up being half the size of a more conventional history.Mary Bilder and Greg Ablavsky echo a point made by Sandy Levinson about the Partisan Republic’s effort to “expand the cast of characters” beyond the “usual suspects” in traditional works of constitutional history. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Updike Toler largely omits the historical context around the Constitutional Convention that other Indian Law scholars—notably Robert Clinton and Greg Ablavsky—have emphasized. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
Schedule:Friday, November 2201:00 PM – 01:30 PM: Lunch and Check-In01:30 PM – 02:00 PM: Introductory Remarks02:00 PM – 03:30 PM: Panel 1 (Interpretation, Construction, and Change) Jack Balkin, Yale; Stephanie Barclay, Georgetown; Sherif Girgis, Notre Dame03:30 PM – 03:50 PM: Break03:50 PM – 05:20 PM: Panel 2 (Making Constitutional Meaning) Greg Ablavsky, Stanford; Paul Gowder, Northwestern; Amanda Shanor, WhartonSaturday, November 2309:00 AM –… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm
" (Forward).From Process, the blog of the Organization of American Historians, Greg Ablavsky (Stanford Law) writes about his recent Journal of American History article “Species of Sovereignty: Native Nationhood, the United States, and International Law, 1783–1795. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:48 am
Greg Ablavsky is an associate professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:43 am
Here, Stanford Law faculty members David Sklansky, Shirin Sinnar, and Greg Ablavsky discuss these historic events—and what may happen next. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm
And Greg Ablavsky has recently emphasized that American lawyers could not afford to ignore Spanish, French, or Mexican property law. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm
Guest post by Professor Greg Ablavsky, Stanford Law SchoolIn Property, I frequently hedge my answers to student questions by cautioning that I am not an expert in intellectual property. [read post]
21 May 2019, 9:59 am
Greg Ablavsky is an associate professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Gregory Ablavsky maintains that the court’s decision this week in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
I’m extremely grateful to the participants in the symposium – Jonathan Gienapp, Greg Ablavsky, Rachel Shelden, Anna Law, Anne Twitty, Simon Gilhooley, Jane Manners, Evelyn Atkinson, Aaron Hall, Christian Fritz, David Schwartz, Connor Ewing, and John Mikhail – for their thoughtful and probing engagement with The Interbellum Constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:40 am
Guest post by Professor Greg Ablavsky, Stanford Law SchoolPer Lisa's request, I have returned to offer some thoughts on the PTAB's tribal sovereign immunity decision (you can find my earlier post here and some additional musings coauthored with Lisa here). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:40 am
Guest post by Professor Greg Ablavsky, Stanford Law SchoolPer Lisa's request, I have returned to offer some thoughts on the PTAB's tribal sovereign immunity decision (you can find my earlier post here and some additional musings coauthored with Lisa here). [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The Copyright Ownership Battle in American Physics”Profit and Reform in the American Progressive Era Chair: Vicki Howard, University of Essex Discussant: Rosanne Currarino, Queen's University (Canada) Daniel Platt, Brown University "Profit and 'Reputable Capital' in the Usury Reform Movement, 1909-1925” … [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:09 pm
Greg Ablavsky is a professor of law the Helen L. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and David Savage at the Los Angeles Times, who notes that “[s]everal liberal justices said they were troubled about leaving internal whistleblowers unprotected, but none voiced support for allowing Somers to sue. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
