Search for: "Griffith v. State Bar" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2007, 7:53 am
District Court in July 2003, challenging as unconstitutional the FDA policy of barring their sale of investigative drugs to terminally ill patients. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  No one disputes that Article I, Section 9 would bar the Secretaries from “draw[ing]” funds from the Treasury if the Executive’s statutory interpretation turns out to be mistaken. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– WI lawyer Thomas Schober of Schober Schober & Mitchell on the firm’s Wisconsin Business Law Blog White House Unveils Plan to Curb Methane Emissions – Cleveland lawyer Andrew Doggett of BakerHostetler on the firm’s North America Shale Blog Social Media: The Importance of Listening First – Legal marketing expert Lindsay Griffiths of International Lawyers Network on Zen & The Art of Legal Networking McCutcheon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Judgement on meaning was handed down by Mr Justice Griffiths in Smith v Baker [2022] EWHC 246 (QB) on 10 February 2022. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
App. 1991), the court barred pharmacist claims.KentuckyHyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:43 am by Steve Vladeck
In the post that follows, I briefly sketch out why this issue was not actually settled by the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Munaf v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Deckebach, 274 U.S. 392 (1927), "were undermined in Takahashi," see In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717, 718-722 (1973); Graham v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:12 pm
The ruling came in a case titled  Kiyemba v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:01 am by Brendan Kevenides
 The Illinois Appellate Court took up a similar issue of statutory construction in People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]