Search for: "Griggs v. Griggs" Results 41 - 60 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
is cited in the following article: Marsha Griggs, Building a Better Bar Exam, 7 Tex. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
SEL relied on the High Court judgment in Griggs v Evans and argued that such an assignment should be implied, relying on the  reasoning  of Mr Prescott QC in that case:“Because the designer is not an employee of the company the legal title to the copyright belongs to him, because the Copyright Act says so; but the equitable title belongs to the company. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
  Source: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/disparate_impact_unintentional_discrimination/ https://legaldictionary.net/griggs-v-duke-power-co/ https://newsone.com/3780050/racial-discrimination-shaving-facial-hair-razor-bumps-dreadlocks-african-americans/ https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2016-05-09Read More [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Kleber also cannot be easily reconciled with aspects of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
Kleber urges a different conclusion in no small part on the basis of the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm by Jon
At the heart of the Ricci case was the doctrine of disparate-impact discrimination, which the Supreme Court first articulated in its 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am by Gail Heriot
Consequently, liability for disparate impact essentially means that funding recipients must be prepared to justify virtually everything they do as "necessary" (as defined by Griggs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm by Jason Rantanen
Guest post by Timothy Holbrook, Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law. [read post]